Sistema GRADE

Artículos introductorios al sistema GRADE:

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

• En este artículo se recoge una introducción a las guías GRADE, junto con algunas recomendaciones sobre el reporte de resultados y establecimiento de conclusiones en base a los mismos.

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

• En este artículo se ofrecen algunas recomendaciones de las guías GRADE sobre el establecimiento de las preguntas de investigación a responder y como seleccionar las variables más relevantes para ello.

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

• En este artículo se ofrece una introducción a como evaluar la calidad de las pruebas de acuerdo a las recomendaciones GRADE.

Evaluación de la certidumbre de los resultados:

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

Síntesis de los resultados:

GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

Generación de las recomendaciones:

GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health | J Clin Epidemiol

Evaluación del riesgo de sesgos:

GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

Preferencias de los pacientes:

GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains | J Clin Epidemiol

Tests diagnósticos

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

Meta-análisis en red:

GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis | J Clin Epidemiol

Equidad:

GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process | J Clin Epidemiol

Modelos predictívos/pronóstico:

GRADE concept paper 2: Concepts for judging certainty on the calibration of prognostic models in a body of validation studies | J Clin Epidemiol

Otras guías:

GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes-Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making | J Clin Epidemiol

GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings | J Clin Epidemiol (Acceso libre)